Cement having cross-linked polymers

ABSTRACT

A composition and method of forming a wellbore cement that includes a cross-linked polyamide. The polyamide is formed by reacting a di-functional amine with an aromatic tri-functional carboxylic acid. The wellbore cement composition is created by blending cement and water with the polyamide and then allowed to cure. Increases in compressive strength, Young&#39;s Modulus, and Poisson&#39;s Ratio of the cement were realized by adding the polyamide to the cement composition.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/701,670 filed Sep. 12, 2017, which claims priority from U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/397,126 filed Sep. 20, 2016, thefull disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in theirentireties and for all purposes.

BACKGROUND 1. Field

The present disclosure relates to a cement, and method of making thecement, that bonds casing to a wellbore. More specifically, the presentdisclosure relates to a cement, and method of making the cement, thatbonds casing to a wellbore, and that includes cross-linked polymers.

2. Related Art

Hydrocarbons that are produced from subterranean formations typicallyflow from the formations to surface via wellbores drilled from surfacethat intersect the formations. Most wellbores are lined with casing andstrings of production tubing inserted within the casing that are forconveying the hydrocarbons to surface. The casing is usually bonded tothe inner surface of the wellbore with a cement that is injected into anannulus that is between the casing and wellbore. In addition toanchoring the casing within the wellbore, the cement also isolatesadjacent zones within the formation from one another. Without the cementisolating these adjacent zones fluids from the different zones, whichare sometimes different, could become mixed in the annular space betweenthe casing and wellbore wall. When one of the different fluids is water,separating it from the hydrocarbon is required. Further, if the waterproducing zone is at a pressure exceeding that of a hydrocarbonproducing zone, water sometimes migrates into the hydrocarbon producingzone to thereby reduce the hydrocarbon producing potential of thewellbore.

The cement also prevents hydrocarbon fluid from flowing uphole from ahydrocarbon producing zone to the surface and in the annulus between thecasing and the wellbore wall. Without the cement, or in instances whencement has failed, hydrocarbons are known to migrate to surface and thenpresent a safety hazard to operations personnel. One problematic areafor gas migration exists for deep wells, where fluid densities often ashigh as 22 pounds per gallon are used to control gas or formation fluidinflux. To control gas migration, cement densities for successfullycementing of the zone of interest are sometimes as high as 22.7 poundsper gallon. As a cement slurry sets, hydrostatic pressure is reduced onthe formation. During this transition, reservoir gases can travel upthrough the cement column resulting in gas being present at the surface.The permeable channels from which the gas flows cause operational andsafety problems at the well site. Causes of gas channeling include: (1)bad mud/spacer/cement design that allows passage of water and gasresulting in failures in cementing operations; (2) high fluid loss fromcement slurries, which causes water accumulation and results inmicro-fractures within the cement body; and (3) cements not providingsufficient hydrostatic pressure to control the high pressure formation.

SUMMARY

Disclosed is an example of a cement composition for use in a wellboreand that includes a cement, a calcium silicate in the cement, and anaramide compound that is formed from a trifunctional carboxylic acid andan organic compound comprising nitrogen. Examples exist where thediamine is one of ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminobenzene,1,4-diaminobenzene, 1,6-diaminohexane, 1,4-phenylenediamine, orcombinations. In one example, the 1,6-diaminohexane is mixed withsebacoyl chloride. In one example, the organic compound having nitrogenincludes a diamine. Optionally the polyaramide is one or more ofpoly(ethylene trimesoylamide), poly-(meta-phenylene trimesoylamide),poly-(para-phenylene trimesoylamide), poly(hexamethylenetrimesoylamide), poly(hexamethylene-co-sebacoyl trimesoylamide),poly-(para-phenylene trimesoylamide), and a blend ofpoly-(meta-phenylene trimesoylamide) and poly(hexamethylenetrimesoylamide). In one embodiment, the aramide compound is apolyaramide condensate compound. In an alternative, the aramide compoundis cross-linked.

Another example of a cement composition for use in a wellbore isdisclosed and that includes a cement and an amide compound that isformed from an aromatic triacid chloride and an organic compound havingnitrogen. An example exists where a polyamide compound is included withthe amide compound. A silica, such as crystalline silica or calciumsilicate, is optionally included with the cement composition. In onealternative, the amine is a diamine, such as ethylenediamine,1,3-diaminobenzene, 1,4-diaminobenzene, 1,6-diaminohexane,1,4-phenylenediamine, and combinations. The triacid chloride can be1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride. Optionally, the organiccompound having nitrogen is an amine. The amide compound isalternatively cross-linked.

Also disclosed is a method of forming a cement composition for use in awellbore, and which includes forming an amide by combining atrifunctional carboxylic acid with an organic compound having nitrogen,combining an amount of cement, water, and the amide to form a mixture,and curing the mixture to form a cement composition. In one example theamide is a cross-linked polyamide. The polyamide can be a polyaramidehaving a molecular weight that ranges from about 189 Daltons to about555 Daltons. The organic compound that having nitrogen optionallyincludes diamine. In one example, the diamine is one of ethylenediamine,1,3-diaminobenzene, 1,4-diaminobenzene, 1,6-diaminohexane,1,4-phenylenediamine, and combinations, and is mixed with sebacoylchloride. Curing the cement can advantageously occur inside of awellbore.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Some of the features and benefits of the present disclosure having beenstated, others will become apparent as the description proceeds whentaken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a graph of weight loss percent versus temperature of a crosslinked polyamide as disclosed here.

FIG. 2 is a graph having plots reflecting compressive loads applied tocement samples versus time.

FIGS. 3A-3C are perspective views of the cement samples loaded to obtainthe data presented in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a graph having plots of compression strength of cement samplesversus a loading rate.

FIGS. 5A-5E are graphical illustrations of stress-strain data obtainedby repeated loading of cement samples.

FIGS. 6A and 6B are graphical depictions respectively of compressionstrength and Young's modulus measured over time and at varyingtemperature of different cements.

FIG. 7 is a side partial sectional view of an example of a wellborehaving cement made in accordance with the present disclosure.

It will be understood that the advantages of the present disclosure arenot limited to the embodiments presented. On the contrary, the presentdisclosure covers all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, asmay be included within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The method and system of the present disclosure will now be describedmore fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in whichembodiments are shown. The method and system of the present disclosuremay be in many different forms and should not be construed as limited tothe illustrated embodiments set forth here; rather, these embodimentsare provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, andwill fully convey its scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbersrefer to like elements throughout. In an embodiment, usage of the term“about” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude. In an embodiment, usageof the term “substantially” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude.

It is to be further understood that the scope of the present disclosureis not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exactmaterials, or embodiments shown and described, as modifications andequivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. In the drawingsand specification, there have been disclosed illustrative embodimentsand, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for the purpose of imitation.Examples in this disclosure are given for the purpose of illustratingembodiments of the present disclosure. However, it is to be understoodthat these examples are merely illustrative in nature, and that theprocess embodiments of the present disclosure are not necessarilylimited to the examples.

Described is an example of a cement composition that is used in awellbore for bonding a tubular to sidewalls of the wellbore; and thatblocks axial flow in an annulus between the tubular and the wellboresidewalls. Blocking flow through the annulus isolates vertically spacedapart portions of the formation from one another. In an embodiment, thecement composition includes a polymer. An example of the compositionhaving the polymer experienced a 25% increase in compressive strengthover that of compositions having latex.

In an example embodiment, the cement composition includes a mixture ofcement, water, and polymer. An optional anti-foaming agent can beincluded in the mixture. In an embodiment where the cement is a Portlandcement, the cement includes tri-calcium silicate (C₃S) and di-calciumsilicate (C₂S). When mixed with water, both C₃S and C₂S can hydrate toform calcium silicate hydrate (C—S—H) gel. Further, in one exampleembodiment, the polymer is a cross-linked polymer. In another exampleembodiment, the polymer is a polyamide, and can be a cross-linkedpolyamide. Yet further optionally, the polymer is a polyaramide;examples exist where the polyaramide is a cross-linked polyaramide. Inone embodiment the polyamide is formed by a condensation reaction. In anoptional example, the condensation reaction is between monomers.Examples exist where the polyamide is aliphatic, and examples existwhere the polyamide is aromatic. In an example, the polymer was producedusing a monomer that mimics the flexibility of a nylon using a longcarbon-chain monomer, and the rigidity and strength of a polyaramideusing an aromatic monomer. In an alternative, the polymer(s) aresynthesized by reacting a trifunctional monomer with a bifunctionalmonomer. In an embodiment, polymer(s), polyamide(s), and/orpolyaramide(s) products are linear, branched, or networked. Alternativesexist where the polymer(s), polyamide(s), and/or polyaramide(s)condensates are formed using a trifunctional monomer, which for thepurposes of discussion here is referred to as a crosslinker;accordingly, such formed products are correspondingly referred to asbeing crosslinked.

Example 1

In one non-limiting example, a polyamide was prepared by condensation ofan aromatic tri-acid chloride with diamine at room temperature byinterfacial polymerization. 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride,trimesic acid trichloride, and trimesoyl chloride are examples of atri-acid chloride. The diamine was dissolved in water or ethanol andadded to a chloroform-cyclohexane solution containing an equalstoichiometric amount of the tri-acid chloride; an emulsifier was alsoadded. Example diamines include ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminobenzene,1,4-diaminobenzene, 1,6-diaminohexane, 1,6-diaminohexane (mixed withsebacoyl chloride), and 1,4-phenylenediamine. In an embodiment,carboxylic acid is used in lieu of the tri-acid chloride.

Example 2

The reaction of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride withethylenediamine and having a molar ratio of 2:3, which produces PolymerA is provided in Equation 1 below.

The molecular weight of Polymer A is 189 Daltons.

Example 3

The reaction of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride with1,3-diaminobenzene and having a molar ratio of 2:3, which producesPolymer B, is provided in Equation 2 below.

The molecular weight of Polymer B is 265 Daltons.

Example 4

The reaction of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride with1,4-diaminobenzene and having a molar ratio of 2:3, which producesPolymer C, is provided in Equation 3 below.

The molecular weight of Polymer C is 265 Daltons.

Example 5

The reaction of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride with1,6-diaminohexane and having a molar ratio of 2:3, which producesPolymer D, is provided in Equation 4 below.

The molecular weight of Polymer D is 273 Daltons.

Example 6

The reaction of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride with1,6-diaminohexane mixed with sebacoyl chloride and having a molar ratioof 1:3:1, which produces Polymer E, is provided in Equation 5 below.

The molecular weight of Polymer E is 555 Daltons.

Reactant ratios for forming Polymer A are not limited to that providedin Example 2 above. Alternative examples of producing Polymer A existusing amounts of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride in a range offrom one to four and amounts of ethylenediamine in a range of two tosix. Reactant ratios for forming Polymer B are not limited to thatprovided in Example 3 above. Alternative examples of producing Polymer Bexist using amounts of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride in arange of from one to four and amounts of 1,3-diaminobenzene in a rangeof two to six. Reactant ratios for forming Polymer C are not limited tothat provided in Example 4 above. Alternative examples of producingPolymer C exist using amounts of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acidchloride in a range of from one to four and amounts of1,3-diaminobenzene in a range of two to six. Reactant ratios for formingPolymer D are not limited to that provided in Example 5 above.Alternative examples of producing Polymer D exist using amounts of1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride in a range of from one to fourand amounts of 1,6-diaminohexane in a range of two to six. Reactantratios for forming Polymer E are not limited to that provided in Example6 above. Alternative examples of producing Polymer E exist using amountsof 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride in a range of from one tofour, amounts of 1,6-diaminohexane in a range of two to six, and amountsof sebacoyl chloride in a range of from one to four.

Example 7

In a non-limiting example of use, an organic phase of 750 milliliters(ml) mixture of a 4:1 ratio of cyclohexane to CHCl₃ and two percent byvolume of Span 85 is added to a 2 liter two-neck round bottom flask andstirred at 600 revolutions per minute (rpm) using a Caframo® BDC 2002overhead stirrer. An aqueous solution of 200 ml of the diamines(1,6-diaminohexane, 1,4-diaminobenzene, 1,3-diaminobenzene, andethylenediamine) is added to form an emulsion, which is stirred for 30minutes. In preparation of interfacial polymerization, a solution of26.5 grams of cross-linker 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloridedissolved in 200 ml of chloroform/CHCl₃ was added to the emulsion at arate of 1 ml/minute, and the resulting solution was stirred for 1-2hours. Advantageously, no heating was applied to the reactants duringpolymerization or during stirring. The resulting polymer was allowed tosettle, and then decanted and washed with 500 ml of diethyl ether, 500ml of tetrahydrofuran, and 500 ml of ethanol. The polymer was thentransferred to a 250 ml round bottom flask, where it was concentrated byrotary evaporation and dried at temperature of 180 Fahrenheit (° F.)until a constant weight of free flowing powder was achieved. The bandsof the infrared spectrum of 1,3-diaminobenzene and 1,4-diaminobenzenewere measured after each condensation reaction.

In a non-limiting prophetic example a polymer is produced using thefollowing constituents: 25.3 percent by weight of chloroform (solvent),52.9 percent by weight of cyclohexane (continuous phase), 1.4 percent byweight of 1-6 diaminohexane, 2.4 percent by weight of1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride, 0.1 percent by weight ofsurfactant, and 17.9 percent by weight of water (dispersed phase). Thecyclohexane, chloroform, and surfactant are combined in a first mixingtank (not shown), and then seventy-five percent by volume of thissolution is transferred to a reactor (not shown). In a second mixingtank (not shown), the 1-6 diaminohexane is dissolved in water and thenadded to the reactor to form an emulsion. In a third mixing tank (notshown) the 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride is dissolved in theremaining twenty-five percent of the cyclohexane, chloroform, andsurfactant mixture. The contents of the third mixing tank are added tothe reactor at a constant rate to polymerize the emulsion; a byproductof which is hydrochloric acid gas. The reactor contents are stirred for24 hours for homogeneity. The polymer will settle in the reactor, andtakes the form of a powder by removing the solvents and drying thepolymer.

In an example, Polymer A is referred to as poly(ethylenetrimesoylamide), Polymer B is referred to as poly-(meta-phenylenetrimesoylamide), Polymer C is referred to as poly-(para-phenylenetrimesoylamide), Polymer D is referred to as poly(hexamethylenetrimesoylamide) (or crosslinked-“PA6T”-trimesoylamide), and Polymer E isreferred to as poly(hexamethylene-co-sebacoyl trimesoylamide)(crosslinked-“nylon610”-trimesoylamide) Embodiments exist where PolymersA E are formed in accordance with Example 1 above, and in analternative, embodiments exist where Polymers A-E are formed inaccordance with Example 7 above.

In one alternative, the polymer solution was stirred for 24 hours forhomogeneity. A free-flowing powder was obtained by decanting, rotaryevaporation, and filtration. Then, the polymer was further dried in anoven at 180° F. overnight or until a constant weight was achieved. Tomeasure the heat resistance of the crosslinked polyaramide, athermogravimetric analysis (TGA) technique was used to continuouslymeasure the weight of a sample as a function of temperature (Q600 TGA,TA Instruments). High heat resistance is a characteristic ofpolyaramides.

Example 8

In one non-limiting example, a cement was prepared having a polymer.Example polymers for this example include Polymers A-E, a 1:1 blend ofPolymers B and D, and combinations. A cement slurry was formed havingfour components: water, cement, 3% by weight of cement of the polymerapplied, and anti-foamer. Optionally, the amount of polymer in theslurry can range from about 0.5% by weight of cement (“bwoc”) to about5% bwoc. This range may be doubled and increased for more favorableresults. Here, a 600-mL cement slurry with defoamer and polymer wasprepared, where 24.2 grams of the polymer added to 806.9 grams of cementand 340.2 grams of water to make a 16.0 pound per gallon (ppg) cement.Any type of cement can be used in the cement slurry, including allPortland cements, any type of cement as classified by the AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials (ASTM), such as Type I, II, II, or V,any type of cement as classified by the American Petroleum Institute(API), such as Class A, C, G, or H, cements where latexes has beenapplied, white, pozzolana, and the like. Portland cements are describedin API specification for “Materials and Testing for Well Cements”, API10B-2 of the American Petroleum Institute. Embodiments exist having noadditional chemical additives. Following API standards the slurry wasblended at a mixing rate of 4,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 14seconds (s) and then increased to 12,000 rpm for 35 s. After mixing, theslurry was then poured into cube molds (2 cubic inches) or cylindermolds (2-inch diameter by 4-inch height). The samples were then placedinto a curing chamber, where the cement remained for 72 hours atconditions of 180 degrees ° F. and 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi).After curing, the cement was removed from the curing chamber and thesample surface prepared to measure its mechanical properties, such ascompression strength.

Example 9

In a non-limiting example of forming a neat cement, 782.2 grams of SaudiG cement was mixed with 348.9 grams of water, which produced a slurrywith a volume of 600 milliliters and a density of 15.8 pounds per gallon(ppg). The slurry was blended at 4,000 rpm for 15 s and blended at12,000 rpm for 35 s, and poured into a brass mold. Inside the mold thecement was cured at 180° F. for 72 hours, and at a pressure of 3000 psi.The ends of the samples were planed after curing so that surfaces of thesamples were parallel. Examples of the cement are listed in Example 7above.

Example 10

In a non-limiting example of use, a cement was prepared having 789.2grams of Saudi G cement, 348.9 grams of water, and 23.7 grams (3% byweight of cement) of one of Polymers A-E, a 1:1 blend of Polymers B andD, and combinations. A 600-mL cement slurry as prepared having a densityof 15.8 ppg. The slurry was blended at 4,000 rpm for 15 s, then blendedat 12,000 rpm for 35 s, and poured into a brass mold. Inside the moldthe cement was cured at 180° F. for 72 hours, and at a pressure of 3000psi. The ends of the samples were planed after curing so that surfacesof the samples were parallel. Examples of the cement are listed inExample 7 above.

Example 11

In a non-limiting example of use, a cement for prepared having 789.2grams of Saudi G cement, 294.4 grams of water, 47.4 grams of a 50% latexsolution (6% bwoc), and 7.1 grams of a stabilizer (15% by weight of thelatex). Latex candidates include carboxylated latexes, and carboxylatedstyrene-butadiene latexes. The slurry was blended at 4,000 rpm for 15seconds and blended at 12,000 rpm for 35 seconds, and poured into abrass mold. Inside the mold the cement was cured at 180° F. for 72hours, and at a pressure of 3000 psi. The ends of the samples wereplaned after curing so that surfaces of the samples were parallel.Examples of the cement are listed in Example 7 above.

Analysis of the polyamide synthesized from Equation 2 above demonstrateda material with a high temperature resistance up to 400° Celsius (° C.),and with weight loss of less than 4% at 195° C. In contrast,styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) latexes have recommended maximumoperating temperatures of 82° C. to 100° C. Shown in graphical form inFIG. 1 is an example of a graph 10 reflecting data obtained by analyzingthe polyamide synthesized in Example 4. Graph 10 includes a line 12 thatrepresents weight loss data and which was obtained by thermogravimetricanalysis. Another line 14 is included with graph 10 and that representsdata obtained using a differential scanning calorimetry. Values forweight percent are shown scaled along a left hand ordinate 16, valuesfor heat flow (W/g) are scaled along a right hand ordinate 17, and anabscissa 18 provides a scale for temperature (° C.). Line 12, thusillustrates percent weight loss of the Equation 2 polyamide with respectto temperature, and shows that the polyamide percent weight loss remainssubstantially linear up to around 400° C., where it begins to decompose.SBR latexes on the other hand have a manufacturer's temperaturerecommendation of around 82° C. to about 100° C.

Additional increases in performance of the polymer cement described hereincluded an increase in compression strength. For example, a percent (%)increase in mechanical property (x) is calculated as [1−(x for controlcement)/(x for polymer cement)]*100. An increase in compression strengthdemonstrates the beneficial effects from crosslinked polyaramideapplication. Referring now to FIG. 2, shown is a graph 20 comparing therespective compressive strengths of neat, polyamide, and latex cements.A series of data points 22, 23, 24 on graph 20 respectively reflectmeasured compressive strengths over time of a latex based cement, apolyamide based cement (made with the 1,6-diaminohexane monomer), and aneat cement. Samples of the cements were loaded over time, thus valuesof load in pounds-force (“lbf”) are scaled along the ordinate 26 ofgraph 20, and values of time in seconds are scaled along the abscissa 28of graph 20. A maximum compression strength of 25,667 lbf was measuredfor the latex based cements. Whereas the polyamide cement samplesprepared in accordance with the present disclosure were tested andmeasured to have a maximum compression strength of over 34,167 lbf. Themaximum compression strength of the neat cement approached 38,000 lbf.

FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate different cement blocks that underwent thecompressive testing illustrated in FIG. 2. Shown in perspective view inFIG. 3A is an example of a sample 30 formed from cement made having anamount of polyamide, such as one or more of Polymers A-E discussedabove. While the compressive testing formed a crack 32 in sample 30, thesample 30 otherwise remained substantially intact. FIG. 3B shows in aperspective view an example of a sample 34 made from a latex-cement, andFIG. 3C is a perspective view of a sample 36 made from neat cement andhaving no additives. Samples 34, 36 were each subjected to compressiveloading, but instead of remaining substantially intact like the sample30 of FIG. 3A, both samples 34, 36 crumbled. The latex-cement (or latexbased cement) was made by adding about 3% by weight of latex to cement.Neat cement was made by mixing cement, water, and an anti-foaming agent.

FIG. 4 is a graph 38 of data obtained by measuring the compressionstrength of cement samples, while loading the cement samples at loadingrates of 27 lbf/s, 267 lbf/s, and 865 lbf/s. The cement samples includedsamples having the polyamides made in accordance with Equations 1-4above, a neat cement, and a latex based cement. Data points 40, 42, 44,46, 48, and 50 are shown on the graph 38. The ordinate 52 of graph 38 isscaled to reflect compression strength in one thousand pounds per squareinch and the abscissa 54 is scaled to the loading rate (lbf/s). Datapoint 40, represents the measured compression strength of the cementhaving the polyamide of Equation 1 above. Data point 42, represents themeasured compression strength of the cement having the polyamide ofEquation 2 above; data point 44, represents the measured compressionstrength of the cement having the polyamide of Equation 3 above; anddata point 46, represents the measured compression strength of thecement having the polyamide of Equation 4 above. Data points 48, 50reflect measured compression strength respectively of a neat cement andlatex based cement. The neat cement and latex based cement that weretested were made in the same way as the neat cement and latex basedcement tested and illustrated in FIGS. 3B and 3C.

As shown in FIG. 4, data point 40, which is a single data point, shows aloading rate of 287 lbf/s and a compression strength of around 4500 psi.Data points 42 reflect compression strengths of around 3500 psi at aloading rate of 27 lbf/s, and a compression strength of around 5600 fora loading rate of 287 lbf/s. Line L₄₂ is shown connecting the two datapoints 42. Data points 44 reflect compression strengths of around 3700psi at a loading rate of 27 lbf/s, and a compression strength of around5800 for a loading rate of 287 lbf/s. Line L₄₄ is shown connecting thetwo data points 44. Data point 46, which is also a single data point,shows a loading rate of 27 lbf/s with a corresponding compressionstrength of around 3700 psi. Data points 48 reflect compressionstrengths of around 4000 psi at a loading rate of 27 lbf/s, and acompression strength of around 6700 for a loading rate of 865 lbf/s.Line L₄₈ is shown connecting the two data points 48. Data points 50reflect compression strengths of around 4500 psi at a loading rate of 27lbf/s, and a compression strength of around 4800 for a loading rate of287 lbf/s. Line L₅₀ is shown connecting the two data points 50. Thecement samples having the polyamide of Equations 2 and 3 and havinglatex were not tested at the loading rate of 865 lbf/s, but how thesesamples would perform at that loading rate was estimated byextrapolating lines L₄₂, L₄₄, and L₅₀. The sample having the polyamideof Equation 1 was tested at a loading rate of 287 lb/s, and the samplehaving the polyamide of Equation 4 was tested at a loading rate of 27lbf/s; as these produced single data points, no corresponding lines wereformed. From FIG. 4 though it is clear that cement samples havingpolyamides have greater compression strengths at higher loading rates.

In a non-limiting example, static measurements and dynamic measurementswere conducted on samples of neat cement, cement having latex, and oncement having some of the polyaramids of Examples 1-6 above. Staticmeasurements were performed using a press (the NER Autolab 3000), whichcan obtain pressures up to 10,000 psi. The test equipment included anaxial loading system, a confining pressure supply system, and dataacquisition software. The samples measured were cylinders having a twoinch diameter and a four inch length, and were jacketed and placedbetween steel end caps. Linear variable differential transformers(LVDTs) included with the press measured axial and radial deformation ofthe sample. The static measurements were taken at ambient temperatureand a pressure of about 3000 psi. The sample was placed in a triaxialcell and pressurized to a confining pressure of 30 megapascals (MPa).Each cement sample was subjected to three axial load cycles. Plots ofthe loading cycles over time resemble triangular waveforms. In eachloading series, an axially applied differential stress of 10 MPa wasapplied, and various peak axial stresses were applied. By applyinguniaxial stress to the sample, its Young's modulus and Poisson's ratiowere calculated based on strain measured by the LVDTs. Differences infailure mechanisms were identified for the different cement samplestested.

Dynamic measurements of the cement samples were performed with aChandler MPRO instrument under confined conditions. The measurementswere obtained at temperatures ranging from about 180° F. to about 350°F., and at a pressure of 3000 psi. The samples remained in theinstrument after curing, and measurements were taken as the cement wassetting. Here, incremental increases in temperature after 20 hoursmeasured cement response to thermal changes and the effects on differentmechanical properties.

Tables 1A-1C below contains ranges of values of compression strength inpsi, Young's modulus in psi, and Poisson's ratio for the samples ofcement containing polyaramid, samples of neat cement, and samples oflatex cement.

TABLE 1A (Polyaramid Cement) Compression Strength Young's modulusPoisson's (psi) (psi) Ratio Static 3000-5000 1.7 × 10⁶-2.2 × 10⁶0.23-0.33 Dynamic Variable 1.6 × 10⁶-1.9 × 10⁶ 0.35-0.37

TABLE 1B (Neat) Compression Strength Young's modulus Poisson's (psi)(psi) Ratio Static 5000-6500 2.0 × 10⁶ 0.2 Dynamic Variable 1.4 ×10⁶-1.9 × 10⁶ 0.35-0.36

TABLE 1C (Latex Cement) Compression Strength Young's modulus Poisson's(psi) (psi) Ratio Static 3000-5000 1.6 × 10⁶-1.9 × 10⁶ 0.25-0.35 DynamicVariable 1.4 × 10⁶-1.9 × 10⁶ 0.35-0.36

Graphs 70, 72, 74, 76, 78 are shown respectively in FIGS. 5A-5E thatreflect applied stresses and thermal cycle responses of cements havingthe following respective additives: latex, Polymer D, Polymer B, PolymerC, and a 1:1 combination of Polymers D and B (“the tested cements”).Plots 80, 82, 84, 86, 88 are respectively illustrated on the graphs 70,72, 74, 76, 78 that depict measured values of strain resulting fromstressing these cements. Ordinates 90, 92, 94, 96, 98 on the graphs 70,72, 74, 76, 78 are scaled to illustrate values of stress in MPa, andabscissas 100, 102, 104, 106, 108 on the graphs 70, 72, 74, 76, 78 arescaled to represent values of strain in millistrain (mE). The graphs 70,72, 74, 76, 78 were generated using data obtained from a series oflaboratory tests that cyclically loaded the tested cements, while at thesame time triaxially compressing the tested cements. The resultingstresses experienced by the tested cements were recorded and compared tothe applied stresses to examine fatigue behavior of the tested cements.Each of the tested cements experienced some degree of hysteresis, thatis, the stress-strain relationship of the tested cements followeddifferent paths under subsequent loading cycles. This is best seen inFIG. 5A, where cement sample being tested contains latex. Here asillustrated by plot 80, the latex cement sample experienced a permanentstrain of 26.7% after the three loading cycles. As shown in FIGS. 5B-5E,tested cements containing the polymers experienced deformations thatwere significantly lower than that of the latex cement of FIG. 5A, andwhich were unexpected. More specifically, the cement sample containingPolymer D experienced a 4.5% permanent strain (FIG. 5B), the cementsample containing Polymer B experienced an 11% permanent strain, thecement sample containing Polymer C experienced a 15.5% permanent strain,and the cement sample containing a blend of Polymers B and D experienceda 1.6% permanent strain. Not to be confined to theory, but it isbelieved that the intermolecular interaction between the polymericstructure and the cement surface is strong due to the reactive amidegroup.

Provided in FIG. 6A is a graph 110 containing plots 112, 114, 116, 118,120, 122 that represent compression strength of various cements. Dataobtained for plots 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, and 122 was respectivelyobtained by testing samples of neat cement, cement containing Polymer C,cement containing latex, cement containing Polymer B, cement containingPolymer D, and cement containing Polymer E. Units of the compressionstrength is in thousands of pounds per square inch (kpsi), and asreflected in FIG. 6A, the compression strength measurements were takenover a length of time and a range of temperatures. Values of compressionstrength are plotted along a left hand ordinate 124, values oftemperature are plotted along a right hand ordinate 126, and values oftime are plotted along abscissa 128. As illustrated in FIG. 6A, thetemperature was 180° F. for 0 to about 70 hours, at 240° F. from about70 hours to about 90 hours, at 300° F. from about 90 hours to about 115hours, and 350° F. from about 115 hours to about 130 hours. Thesubsequent changes in temperature took place over a relatively shortperiod of time and were generally instantaneous. As shown in the Exampleof FIG. 6A, compression strengths of every cement sample tested droppedat a substantial rate at each temperature increase. At temperaturesequal to or greater than 240° F. the samples demonstrated a generalreduction in magnitude over time, even when exposed to constanttemperature. As illustrated by plot 114, the cement sample containingPolymer C possessed a compression strength having the largest magnitudeat temperatures of 300° F. and greater, including neat cements and thathaving latex.

A graph 130 is shown in FIG. 6B having plots 132, 134, 136, 138, 140that represent measured values of Young's modulus (×10⁶ psi) of samplesrespectively made up of cement having Polymer C, neat cement, cementhaving latex, cement having Polymer B, and cement having Polymer D.Values of Young's modulus are plotted along a left hand ordinate 142,values of temperature are plotted along a right hand ordinate 144, andvalues of time are plotted along abscissa 144. The values of temperatureand respective durations used to generate the plots 132, 234, 136, 138,140 of FIG. 6B were substantially the same as that used to generate thedata for FIG. 6A. Similar to the results of FIG. 6A, the measuredYoung's modulus of the cement samples experienced a significant rate ofdecrease with each increase in temperature. Further illustrated in FIG.6B is that the measured Young's modulus for the sample having Polymer C(plot 132) was greater than that of the samples having neat cement (plot134) and cement with latex (plot 136). Further values obtained forPolymer C that are over the varying ranges of temperatures, includevalues of transit and shear velocity times. Transit velocity valuesranged between 7 and 8 microseconds per inch for temperatures of 180° F.to 350° F., and which generally increased with increasing temperature.Shear velocity times ranged from about 15 to about 18 microseconds perinch for temperatures of 180° F. to 350° F. Shear velocity values alsoincreased with increasing temperature.

In one non-limiting example of use, combining the reactants to form thepolyamide generates an emulsion of a dispersed phase and a continuousphase; where the diamines are contained in the dispersed phase, and thetriacid chloride is in the continuous phase. Vesicles are formed byinterfacial polymerization along interfaces between the dispersed andcontinuous phase, and are made up at least in part by the polyamide. Dueto additional processing, or compression within the cement, the vesiclesare ruptured to form spent capsules. Thus in an embodiment, at leastsome of the polyamide in the cement is in the form of spent capsules,which are generally non-spherical, and range in shape from a planarconfiguration, to those with a cross section that approximates anellipse. In an alternative, the polyamide spent capsules have distinctshapes that dynamically expand and contract, such as by osmosis. In anembodiment, the vesicles are emulsion templated, where the dispersed andcontinuous phase fluids yield the shape of the polyamide at theinterface. Other possible shapes of the polyamide include hollowedfibers.

Referring now to FIG. 7, shown in a side partial sectional view is anexample of a wellbore 148 intersecting a formation 150. Casing 152 linesthe wellbore 148, and where cement 154 is disposed in an annular spacebetween the casing 152 and wall of the wellbore 148. In an example, thecement 154 includes a polyamide, and can further include a polyamidemade in accordance with the present disclosure, such as one or more ofPolymers A-E and their combinations. A wellhead assembly 156 is shownmounted at an opening of the wellbore 148 and which contains pressure inthe wellbore 148, as well as controlling flow from and into the wellbore148. Production tubing 158 is shown deployed within the casing 152 andinside of which connate fluid produced from the formation 150 can bedelivered to the wellhead assembly 156. An optional controller 160 isshown on surface and which is used to monitor downhole conditions in thewellbore 148, and that can convey signals downhole for operatingproduction equipment (not shown), such as valves and packers.

In one example, crosslinking the polyaramide yields particles that arelinear and particles that are three-dimensional. Thus crosslinkingenhances the base polymer and forms a polymer network. Benefits offorming an aromatic compound include the advantages of rigidity andstrength. Also, the alkane long chain of the 1,6-hexane diamine providespolymer flexibility. Another advantage of the polymer products describedhere include, the electron displacement between the amine, carbonyl andaromatic group, which yields an increase in binding between the polymerand the cement, and in turn enhances chemical interaction of the polymerto the cement. It has also been found to be advantageous to usedifferent polymer moieties when forming the polyamide cement whichincreases ductility of cement and offers the potential for chemicalinteractions with cement and physical blocking by the polymer. In anexample, physical blocking occurs when the polymers are insoluble theybecome particles embedded in the cement that serve as a physicalbarrier. These advantages provide a way to create a cement polymer withmechanical properties to prolong the lifespan of wellbore cementsheaths, thereby preventing cement casing annulus pressure problems.

The present disclosure, therefore, is well adapted to carry out theobjects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as othersinherent. While a presently preferred embodiment of the disclosure hasbeen given for purposes of disclosure, numerous changes exist in thedetails of procedures for accomplishing the desired results. These andother similar modifications will readily suggest themselves to thoseskilled in the art, and are intended to be encompassed within the spiritof the present disclosure and the scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A cement composition for use in a wellborecomprising: a cement; and an amide compound that is formed by reactingan aromatic tri-acid chloride with an amine and that when mixed with thecement and injected into an annular space around a tubular installed inthe wellbore, the combination of the cement and the amide compound bondthe tubular to the wellbore and block axial flow through the annulus. 2.The cement composition of claim 1, where the amide compound comprises apolyamide compound.
 3. The cement composition of claim 1, where theamide compound comprises a polyamide, where the amine comprises adiamine, and where the polyamide was prepared by condensation of thearomatic tri-acid chloride with the diamine at room temperature byinterfacial polymerization.
 4. The cement composition of claim 1, wherethe amine comprises 1,3-diaminobenzene.
 5. The cement composition ofclaim 1, where the tri-acid chloride comprises1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride.
 6. The cement composition ofclaim 1, wherein the amine comprises a diamine.
 7. The cementcomposition of claim 1, where the amide compound is cross-linked.
 8. Thecement composition of claim 1, where the amine comprises1,4-diaminobenzene.
 9. The cement composition of claim 1, where theamine comprises 1,6-diaminohexane.
 10. The cement composition of claim1, where the amine comprises 1,4-phenylenediamine.
 11. The cementcomposition of claim 1, where the amine is a powder.
 12. A cementcomposition for use in a wellbore comprising: a cement for bonding atubular to a sidewall of the wellbore; and an amide compound that isformed by reacting an aromatic triacid chloride and a diamine thatcomprises 1, 6-diaminohexane mixed with sebacoyl chloride, and whencombined with the cement forms a physical barrier that blocks flow whenplaced in an annular space between the tubular and the sidewall of thewellbore.
 13. A cement composition for use in a wellbore comprising: acement for bonding a tubular to a sidewall of the wellbore; and an amidecompound formed by reacting a diamine an a carboxylic acid thatcomprises 1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride, and when combinedwith the cement forms a physical barrier that blocks flow when placed inan annular space between the tubular and the sidewall of the wellbore.